Breaking the silence on the harmful effects of the EMR Susan J.Physician burnout solutions should be focused on subtraction not addition Kent DeLay, MD | Physician.Uncovering the controversial debate surrounding climate change Martin C.The untold struggles patients face with resident doctors Denise Reich | Conditions.The battle for authorship: humanity vs.From addiction to exclusion: a physician’s struggle for redemption Jeffrey L.Patient privacy: Why it matters more than you think Robert Murry, MD | Physician.Why retail giants will revolutionize American health care Robert Pearl, MD | Policy.Food is medicine: Why doctors care about the Farm Bill Ashwani Garg, MD | Policy.The insurance denial process: one oncologist’s fight against a broken system Jennifer Lycette, MD | Physician.He is the author of Winning Fights: 12 Proven Principles for Winning on the Street, in the Ring, at Life, and can be reached at his self-titled site, Dr. Phillip Stephens is chief physician assistant, department of emergency medicine, Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Lumberton, North Carolina. ED overload is a systemic symptom that needs a bigger ditch with more people willing to dig. We mostly need to establish broader scale solutions. Some problems can be controlled, and some cannot. We need to understand variation as there is no universal problem. To that end, we need to stop chasing yesterday’s issue today. Scale at least mitigates controllable variation. So even weather accounts for a small amount that can’t be controlled and each variable adds up. But no journal is going to publish a study when the variation is that low. I was studying how weather fronts affect ED volume. By the way, the weather accounts for 1 to 5 percent of ED variation. Therefore, 33 percent of ED variation is random from the start. But, EDs have little control over how many patients show up, and one-third of the variation that determines a patient’s length of stay is due to how many people are waiting to be seen at that moment in time. The math revealed about one-third of ED variation in terms of length of stay could be directly attributed to simply how many people were waiting in the ED lobby. I statistically correlated ED volume to throughput years ago. Then there is the question of how much variation and scale is within the control of human intervention. It’s a symbiotic problem with a symbiotic solution. Clinic services can force higher ED volumes if patients can’t get med refills or secure an appointment. Psychiatric services can slow mental health dispositions. Failure to have equal urgency is myopic.Īncillary service delays spill over into the ED. An inpatient nurse may have received three patients back to back. If patients aren’t being efficiently discharged in minutes on the inpatient side, they aren’t going to be admitted to the floor in minutes from the ED side. Think about chaos theory and the butterfly effect. Efficiency is like a biological organism where one system affects another in a symbiotic fashion. The scale of ED efficiency must be widened to include systemwide efficiency. The most successful hospitals that have solved their efficiency issues are ones that finally embraced the idea that an overwhelmed ED is not simply an ED problem. EDs cannot control how many patients show up. Industry can decide how many widgets roll in the front door. But variation in emergency departments foils the input side. Inputs can be controlled when implementing industrial efficiency measures. The problem, though, has always been variation. Efficiency experts have applied manufacturing solutions to EDs with varying success. The challenge is capacity over demand solutions require a larger budget than most hospitals can expend. It’s a great term and gets closer to an efficiency solution than others that have been attempted. It is defined as staffing and resources able to handle over 100% of expected variation whether it’s volume, acuity or other input issues. The term “capacity over demand” was coined by researchers who have studied this problem. The solution is non-reactive as well because the solution is scale. Understanding variation prevents ED’s from being reactive. To do otherwise is simply treating the symptom and not the disease. Managing efficiency becomes more a matter of understanding the range of variation a specific ED faces rather than chasing yesterday’s problem. The only constant is that efficiency barriers vary widely then permeate the system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |